Escort Redline vs Valentine One Review: Both Stellar Performers
Escort Redline versus Valentine One Review
Updated Escort Redline Gets Advanced Feature Set visit Escort Redline Review.
Escort Redline Raw Sensitivity versus Potentially “Higher” False Rates
I think it is going to be very interesting to see how the new Escort Redline ($499) is going to look to some [other] reviewers when historically the Valentine One ($399)—which also has possessed high sensitivity levels (and coupled with very quick response times) but [came with] higher “false” alerts as a consequence—has been historically hammered [by] some reviewers for its uber-sensitive behavior(s).
If, as I expect, the new Escort Redline will perform in the same vein (“vain“) as the venerable Valentine One (but with potentially even higher sheer [radar detection] performance), it will mean that the Escort Redline will most certainly be a very significant and exciting product (a departure, really) from Escort, however, I believe the Passport Redline has the potential to create a sort of a conundrum for some of these [same] reviewers who have historically been critical of the Valentine One for the same type of performance (although to its credit, Escort has been very clear about its intended behavior and purpose).
I believe this is going to be very interesting to see how this plays out online, will there be moral clarity/consistency, or not?
If the Escort Passport Redline, is praised for its high raw performance even while it comes with a higher level of potential “falsing” then what does it mean for all the historical reviews of the Valentine One which have historically criticized the V1 for possessing the same type (or similar) behavior to radar sources (from bonafide police radar and not)?
I, for one, have always appreciated what the Valentine One is/has been and its design approach philosophically and I welcome Escort’s decision to offer a windshield-mount radar detector possessing potentially the same philosophical design elements while remaining (myself) entirely consistent on this matter.
Here’s are just two examples of the inconsistencies that have existed with some other reviews.
For a long-time, the Valentine One was the most expensive windshield-mount radar detector (although its price point has stayed unchanged at $399). Reviewers have always hammered the V1 on its high price…that was until Escort and Beltronics started introducing products that were priced even higher. Do you recall reading any reviews about those products being excessively priced? I don’t recall seeing them.
Remember the review calling the V1 the “chicken-little” of radar detectors and the subsequent references to that review from Automobile Magazine? Are you catching my drift? How about the notions of the V1 as being a “noisy” and “old” radar detector compared to the “latest” [quiet] model like the Passport 9500ix.
Having journalistic integrity is more important to me than winning any popularity contest from my readers or from the manufacturers (whose products) I review, no matter what price I may have paid for having that conviction.
If, indeed, the Escort Passport Redline may finally put to rest this long-raging (longest and most passionate?) debate in our very small industry (although laser detection performance will very likely remain a decided win in Valentine’s favor) with both the manufacturers and their [very] passionate group of consumers, it will still not detract from my appreciation and respect for what I believe has been one of the most purely designed pieces of consumer electronics for nearly two decades, the V1.
Cool Runnings, Peace be da Journey…
Please support those that support this blog:
Recommended Purchasing Sources for the Redline:
Related Online Discussion:
- Redline Validates Valentine 1 as Driver’s Detector
- Escort’s Redline: Raw Sensitivity versus Potentially “Higher” False Rates